A Socialized Wellness Care Program Calls for Population Control and Impeccable Registries
In a nationalized overall health care method, you have to have to know who is who – otherwise the method could under no circumstances be capable identify who is entitled. The structure depends on how the method is made and made, but with a nationalized wellness care program you will be tracked by the state where you reside and how you move in a manner that is unseen in America. The nationalized overall health care program becomes a automobile for population manage.
If you leave the United States and are no longer a resident of the state, even if you are a citizen and might retain a driving license, you will have to report immediately if you want to stay away from the 13% health care tax. flex card for seniors use the quantity 13% as it is in Sweden to exemplify the actual tax pressure that is laid upon you for the nationalized overall health care.
Let’s say you moved and you do not want to spend the 13% tax for services you do not acquire, can acquire, or want to taken out from the tax roll. The mammoth entity has no interest to let you go so straightforward. You will end up having to reveal your private life – companion, dwellings, travel, income, and job to prove your case that you have the proper to leave the public well being care method and do not need to spend the tax. If you have to seek an appeal, your data could be a portion of administrative court documents that are open and public documents. As quickly as you return to the United States, you will be automatically enrolled once again and the taxes get started to pile up.
Public universal health care has no interest in safeguarding your privacy. They want their tax cash and, to fight for your rights, you will have to prove that you meet the specifications to not be taxable. In that approach, your private life is up for show.
The national ID-card and national population registry that includes your healthcare info is a foundation of the nationalized well being care technique. You can see exactly where this is going – population control and potential to use the law and overall health care access to map your entire private life in public searchable databases owned and operated by the government.
By operating an impeccable population registry that tracks exactly where you live, who you live with, when you move and your citizen status such as residency the Swedes can separate who can obtain universal well being care from those not entitled. The Swedish authorities will know if you have a Swedish social safety quantity, with the tap of the keyboard, additional data about yourself than you can remember. The Swedish government has taken sharing of details in between agencies to a new level. The cause is really uncomplicated – to collect health care tax and suppress any tax evasion.
It is heavily centralized and only the central administration can modify the registered information in the information. So if you want to modify your name, even the slightest modify, you have to file an application at a national agency that processes your paperwork. This centralized population registry tends to make it feasible to identify who is who below all circumstances and it is essential for the national overall health care system. Otherwise, any person could claim to be entitled.
To implement that in the United States requires a entirely new doctrine for population registry and control. In an American context that would demand that every single existing driving license had to be voided and reapplied under stricter identification guidelines that would match not only information from Internal Revenue Service, state government, municipal government, Social Safety Administration, and Division of Homeland Security but just about any agency that offers services to the general public. The cause why a new population registry would be necessary in the United States is the truth that lax guidelines dating back to the 1940s up until the War on Terrorism, and stricter identification criteria following 9/11, has made a significant percentage of individual facts about folks questionable.
If America as an alternative neglects maintaining secure records, determining eligibility for public overall health care would not be probable and the floodgates for fraud would open and rampant misuse of the method would prevail. This would sooner or later bring down the system.
It is financially impossible to produce a universal well being care program devoid of clearly knowing who is entitled and not. The technique needs to have limits of its entitlement. A social safety number would not be adequate as these numbers have been handed out via decades to temporary residents that may not even live in the United States or may well currently be out of status as illegal immigrants.
